VITALIK BUTERIN proposes updates to the Ethereum scale strategy

Vitalik Buterin has suggested changes in the Ethereum scale plan that focus on facilitating the execution of local nodes while admitting the layer of layer 1 (L1).

Its proposals come in response to concerns that increasing the L1 gas limit could make users execute complete nodes.

Partially apátra us

In mail In ethresear.ch, the co -founder of Ethereum argues that users can be achieved to function their own nodes while continuing expand The scalability of the network.

He described several solutions to allow this. To support the local node operation, it introduced a new type called “partially stateless node.” This design verifies the blockages without storing all past data and maintains the complete verified chain using methods without state or ZK-EVM.

“This type of node would give the benefits of direct access to the state that a user needs to worry, as well as the maximum maximum privacy of access to that state,” he said.

Users can also customize which parts of the state save, such as accounts data or frequent access applications. Buterin said this configuration could even be administered by a contract in the chain, with the node that kept only without processing and not Merkle branches.

In the short term, the Ethereum co-founder suggests the complete deployment of EIP-4444, which reduces the needs of the disc space by limiting the historical data stored by nodes to approximately 36 days. It also asks for the creation of a distributed history storage system where the nodes store previous data fragments. This would be maintained through erase coding and avoid dependence on centralized storage suppliers.

Another change implies modifying gas costs so that storage operations are more expensive and less expensive execution. This encourages the efficient use of the network. In the medium term, Bugerin pointed out the verification without a state as a way to further reduce the storage needs of nodes eliminating the need to store state branches of Merkle.

The limitations of other solutions

The article addresses a common concern that increasing the L1 gas limit could make users operate complete nodes due to increasing demands for resources.

The 31 -year -old also explains that validating the block chain has traditionally been the main reason to execute a complete node, there is another important way in which they can be used. This includes operating a local RPC server for confidence access, resistant to censorship and friendly with privacy to data in the chain.

Although technologies such as ZK-EVM and the recovery of private information (PIR) offer promising alternatives without confidence, Bugerin points out several limitations. These include the high cost of completely cryptographic solutions, the risks to the privacy of metadata and the threats of censorship of centralized suppliers of RPC.